Researchers in the University of
Wyoming's Department of Zoology and Physiology and Program in Ecology
discovered that size does matter—as it pertains to the effectiveness of
secondary species' wildlife protection relative to the size of a wildlife
reserve set aside for an umbrella species.
The umbrella species
concept is defined as multiple wildlife species
being indirectly protected under the umbrella of a reserve created to enhance
conservation for one species—in this case, the greater sage grouse in
Wyoming. The research group investigated two potential mechanisms—reserve size
and species similarity—underlying the concept's successful application. Larger
alternative reserves serve as better umbrellas but, regardless of reserve size,
not all species received equal protection, the study determined.
"This study provides us a
better understanding of which species might fall through the cracks, and which
may need targeted attention for their conservation," says Anna Chalfoun, a
UW associate professor of zoology and an assistant unit leader for the Wyoming
Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit.
"I was surprised at the
findings. The longtime assumption is that what's good for the grouse is good
for any other species living in sagebrush country," says Jason Carlisle, a
Ph.D. student in UW's Program in Ecology from 2011-17 who led the study.
"Sage grouse are often the flagship species in the ecosystem. But, when
examining how well the protected area established for sage grouse covers other
species that depend on sage grouse habitat, it leaves a lot to be
desired."
Carlisle was lead author and
Chalfoun a co-author of a paper, titled "Identifying Holes in the Greater
Sage-Grouse Conservation Umbrella," that was published March 30 in the
online version of The Journal of Wildlife Management and is expected
to be in print later this month. The journal publishes manuscripts containing
information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science.
Topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and
their habitats that have direct or indirect implications for wildlife
management and conservation.
Douglas Keinath, formerly the
lead vertebrate zoologist with the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database at UW;
and Shannon Albeke, a research scientist/eco-informaticist in the Wyoming
Geographic Information Science Center, were co-authors of the paper. Carlisle
and Keinath also were part of the Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife
Research Unit. The project was funded by a state wildlife grant from the
Wyoming Game and Fish Department.
"When you hear people
generally talking about sage grouse, whether it be land managers or
politicians, they oftentimes are already making an assumption that sage grouse,
as an umbrella species, is benefiting other species," Chalfoun says.
"But, that assumption had not been critically tested."
No comments:
Post a Comment