February
5, 2019, Zoological Society
of London
Remote
recording devices used to 'eavesdrop' on a reintroduced population of one of
New Zealand's rarest birds have been heralded as a breakthrough for
conservation.
Scientists
from international conservation charity ZSL (Zoological Society of London),
Imperial College London and conservationists from the Rotokare Scenic Reserve
Trust used acoustic monitoring devices to listen in on the 'conversations' of
New Zealand's endemic hihi bird, allowing them to assess the success of the
reintroduction without impacting the group.
For the
first time ZSL scientists were able to use the calls of a species as a proxy
for their movement. A happy hihi call sounds like two marbles clanging together
in what is known as the 'stitch' call. Scientists saw the calls change from an
initial random distribution to a more settled home range—marking the hihi
reintroduction and the new method a success.
The
study, published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution today (5
February 2019) was carried out in the Rotokare Scenic Reserve in the Taranaki
region of North Island, where 40 juvenile birds were released in April 2017.
The first time hihi have been seen in the region since their regional
extinction over 130 years ago.
Once
found across northern New Zealand, the hihi or stichbird (Notiomystis cincta) are now classed as locally extinct across most
of their former range, due to habitat
loss and fragmentation and the spread of non-native invasive mammal
predators. There are only a few thousand adults left in highly protected
reserves.
Dr. John
Ewen, Senior Research Fellow at ZSL's Institute of Zoology said: "Hihi are
an important native species, who play a crucial role in pollinating indigenous
plant species and need a pristine environment in which to thrive.
Reintroduction, or translocation, is considered the most effective conservation
action we can take to save the hihi bird in New Zealand, but as with other
reintroduction programmes for other species around the world, we've found it
can be challenging to accurately monitor their success.
"Physically
monitoring animals in the field or fitting them with radio-trackers can be
invasive, expensive and more importantly can influence the behaviour or
survival of released individuals, which could drastically influence our
understanding and outcome of the reintroduction.
No comments:
Post a Comment