By Rhys
Gregory On Apr 24, 2019
Farmers
have hit back at claims over the role of farming in the decline of curlews and
other species, saying environmental charities and advisors must take their fair
share of the blame for policies which have led to habitat degradation and
increased predation.
The RSPB
claims farming practices are partly to blame for a drop of 80% in the number of
curlews in Wales since 1990, but farmers say environmental policies on vast
areas of curlew habitat were based on advice from environmental charities and
advisors – and that many of these have been particularly damaging for species such
as curlews.
Around
40% of Welsh agricultural land is subject to environmental scheme rules, with
the percentage far higher in key upland areas which were once core nesting
areas for curlews.
“Many
areas which were once full of nesting curlews have for two decades or more been
in schemes that have reduced grazing drastically, and the curlews have now gone
– so it’s clear that the advice from environmental charities and advisors about
reducing grazing was wrong,” said FUW President Glyn Roberts.
The RSPB
has admitted that vegetation overgrowth is having an adverse impact on suitable
nesting habitat and that grazing levels need to be increased to help curlews
and other species such as golden plover.
“Overgrowth
of vegetation on land which was previously ideal for curlews and other species
is a direct result of undergrazing, often as a result of environmental scheme
rules, and farmers who took great pleasure in the curlews which once nested on
their land are extremely angry that their warnings about the adverse
environmental impacts of removing animals from habitat were ignored.
“It’s
welcome that this problem is finally being acknowledged by the likes of the
RSPB, but there also needs to be some acknowledgement that the policies which
led to drastic cuts in wildlife were based in the first place on advice and
lobbying by environmental charities and advisors.”
The
RSPB’s state of birds in Wales report, published in December, states “…curlews
show a preference for habitats with lower vegetation densities and only
moderate rush cover” acknowledging that where livestock densities have been
greatly reduced compared to historic levels “…it is highly likely that habitat
conditions will have deteriorated for curlews.”
No comments:
Post a Comment