April 07,2013
Ask Vermont
biologist Rosalind Renfrew how changes in land use and climate may be altering
the state and she can stack her desk with scientific studies — or simply
speculate on the arrival of the red-bellied woodpecker.
The southern species was once so rare in theGreen
Mountains it wasn’t recorded by the Vermont Breeding Bird Atlas
upon its initial release in 1985. A quarter-century later, the woodpecker is
common enough that the second version — edited by Renfrew — reports sightings
in seven of the state’s 14 counties.
Vermont
boasts more than 200 nesting bird species. The inaugural atlas that chronicled
them was the first such state or provincial publication in North
America . But the new issue is considered even more newsworthy —
Gov. Peter Shumlin unveiled it this past week at a special press conference —
because it documents unprecedented shifts.
“This atlas is a portrait ofVermont
in flux — great global trends illustrated at a scale of song and feather,”
Ripton author and activist Bill McKibben declares on the book’s back cover.
The state from which winter-weary residents traditionally flee now is attracting all sorts of southern flyers, the second edition shows. Conversely, warmer weather is threatening to scare away a few northern natives.
Think all this is for the birds?Vermont
birdwatchers annually spend an estimated $50 million. Biologists, for their
part, say the state’s ecology is woven together like one big nest. Birds don’t
simply sing and fly, they also pollinate plants, disperse seeds and eat insects
such as gypsy moths, tent caterpillars and other plant-munching pests that
threaten farms and forests.
“We cannot know the nature ofVermont ,
the health of woodlands, wetlands and other wild places without knowing the
status of our birds,” Renfrew says.
Researchers at the private, nonprofitVermont
Center for Ecostudies in Norwich , having posted
their findings on the Internet, are ready to release them in book form this week.
Everything about the University Press of New England hardcover is big: Six
pounds, 576 pages, 208 color photos, 215 graphs, 415 maps, 591 tables. Oh, and
the price: $75 — and well worth it, its creators say.
“This book will renew your faith in print,” says Bryan Pfeiffer, an ardentVermont bird expert
who’d gush even if he weren’t a second-edition contributor and publicist. “And
this is a case where being second is better than being first — we have a
baseline that we can see is changing.”
Launching the state’s most comprehensive bird count a generation ago, 200 volunteers surveyed the state from 1976 to 1981 to collect data for the 1985 atlas. For this year’s follow-up, some 350 returned to the field from 2003 to 2007 in search of similarities and differences.
The new atlas shows some birds are increasing with the help of conservation efforts (the bald eagle, common loon, osprey, peregrine falcon and wild turkey) and maturation ofVermont
forests (the barred owl and Cooper’s hawk).
Southern species such asCarolina
wrens may be flying north because it’s feeling more like home.
“Climate change is one likely cause,” Renfrew says, “but it’s very hard to demonstrate.”
Take the red-bellied woodpecker. Experts speculate its arrival could be sparked by warmer weather. Or more people feeding them. Or more tree cavities for nesting.
“We need to be cautious on attributing changes,” Pfeiffer says. “The atlas only shows trends. Most of the time it doesn’t ascribe cause; sometimes it suggests cause.”
That said, the state has seen a severe decline in most grassland species — the Eastern meadowlark, for one — with the loss of thousands of acres of undisturbed meadowland to haying, forests and development.
“That’s an example how birds are responding to land-use change,” Renfrew says.
Of 19 species that feed on flying insects — “aerial insectivores” such as common nighthawks, flycatchers, nightjars, swifts, swallows and whip-poor-wills — 13 dropped in number. Biologists speculate this may be caused by decreases in prey and in nesting and wintering habitats and increases in mercury and other atmospheric toxins.
The southern species was once so rare in the
“This atlas is a portrait of
The state from which winter-weary residents traditionally flee now is attracting all sorts of southern flyers, the second edition shows. Conversely, warmer weather is threatening to scare away a few northern natives.
Think all this is for the birds?
“We cannot know the nature of
Researchers at the private, nonprofit
“This book will renew your faith in print,” says Bryan Pfeiffer, an ardent
Launching the state’s most comprehensive bird count a generation ago, 200 volunteers surveyed the state from 1976 to 1981 to collect data for the 1985 atlas. For this year’s follow-up, some 350 returned to the field from 2003 to 2007 in search of similarities and differences.
The new atlas shows some birds are increasing with the help of conservation efforts (the bald eagle, common loon, osprey, peregrine falcon and wild turkey) and maturation of
Southern species such as
“Climate change is one likely cause,” Renfrew says, “but it’s very hard to demonstrate.”
Take the red-bellied woodpecker. Experts speculate its arrival could be sparked by warmer weather. Or more people feeding them. Or more tree cavities for nesting.
“We need to be cautious on attributing changes,” Pfeiffer says. “The atlas only shows trends. Most of the time it doesn’t ascribe cause; sometimes it suggests cause.”
That said, the state has seen a severe decline in most grassland species — the Eastern meadowlark, for one — with the loss of thousands of acres of undisturbed meadowland to haying, forests and development.
“That’s an example how birds are responding to land-use change,” Renfrew says.
Of 19 species that feed on flying insects — “aerial insectivores” such as common nighthawks, flycatchers, nightjars, swifts, swallows and whip-poor-wills — 13 dropped in number. Biologists speculate this may be caused by decreases in prey and in nesting and wintering habitats and increases in mercury and other atmospheric toxins.
No comments:
Post a Comment